After eighty years of oil exploitation in the Middle Magdalena region, the people of Puerto Wilches have yet to see how oil can improve their lives. Poorly maintained roads, underfunded schools, scarce potable water, and widespread hunger, among other issues, have eroded the community’s trust in oil companies.
During the last five years, Puerto Wilches has registered the highest poverty levels in the department of Santander. One quarter of the population falls under the monetary poverty line. This indicator stands in stark contrast to the municipality’s oil exploitation figures. Political scientist Óscar Sampayo asserts that the Cantagallo-Yairirí Concession, an oil field that encompasses Puerto Wilches, produces between 16 and 19 thousand barrels per da. The price of oil has fluctuated between 40 and 90 US dollars during the field’s operation.
Besides noticing the contrast between the oil industry’s wealth and the region’s poverty, many inhabitants of Puerto Wilches consider that fracking projects are not being agreed upon with communities. Yuvelis summarizes this perception straightforwardly, “Ecopetrol never consulted anything with us; it just made it clear to us that fracking would occur one way or another.”
The malaise builds on the recommendations of the panel of experts. The document maintains that the pilot projects should obtain a “social license,” a concept coined by the Canadian academics Ian Thomson and Robert Boutilier to refer to a community’s perceptions of an extractive project and the presence or absence of trust in the operation.
In the eyes of the young members of Aguawil, oil companies have used the concept of “social license” ambiguously. According to them, sometimes the concept means effective community involvement in the decision-making process of the pilots. Sometimes it simply refers to the projects’ promotion and dissemination.
Even the president of Ecopetrol, Felipe Bayón, has used the euphemism, publicly stating the need for these projects to hold a “social license” without explaining the implications of the concept. “Now that the definition is no longer convenient for them, they claim that the term simply means that they will disseminate the process with us. Its use is questionable because there are no criteria to issue it [the social license]. Nobody knows what it entails, and we have not heard an explanation,” says Yuvelis.