This expression is becoming increasingly meaningful as scientific research brings to light the connections between the Arctic and the rest of the planet.
The Arctic is generally seen as the Northern Hemisphere’s “cooling system” and the SWIPA explains that changes there may even have repercussions on South East Asia’s monsoon system. An illustration of this interconnectedness came out last month, when Chinese researchers highlighted the climatic repercussions of Arctic cryosphere changes, linking extreme pollution events in China to the diminution of Arctic sea ice and the increase in snowfall in Siberia.
The report also says increased river discharge due to ice sheet, glacier and snow melt, as well as the disappearance of sea ice, will also increase the amount of freshwater in the Arctic Ocean, potentially triggering changes in the oceanic circulation in the Northern Hemisphere. Changes in this circulation are also likely to affect the weather conditions in more southern areas.
Beyond climatic effects, the melting Greenlandic ice sheet and other Arctic glaciers are contributing to one third of the yearly global sea-level rise (or just over 1 millimeter per year), with an estimated total contribution of 25cm between 2006 and 2100, if increases in greenhouse gases continue at the current rate. Open water in the Arctic thus contributes to coastal erosion and other impacts on low-lying lands elsewhere in the world.
In these kinds of assessment, it’s usual to try to find a silver lining in the dark clouds. However, in the SWIPA there are way more cons than pros. The benefits linked to the opening of new sea routes, or the access to natural resources such as fish and oil and gas – the burning of which use would further increase global greenhouse gas concentrations – do not balance the cumulative costs of Arctic change which the report estimates at USD 7-90 trillion between 2010 and 2100.