Expectations also need to be lowered, said Øyvind Eggen, a senior advisor on development policy with Civita, a Norwegian think tank. “The UN system has a huge challenge based on the way it is configured and uses knowledge.”
Steve Hamilton is the head of the International Organization for Migration in Norway. He was pessimistic about the chances of success, citing countries like Chad and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
“If you look at the data, they have gone nowhere” in terms of real development, Hamilton said. These and other countries may have “fulfilled terms of agreements” with donor countries, “and that’s it.”
Hamilton said long-term commitments and funding are needed “but the reality is that donors think along 12-month timelines for deliverables for reports.” What is needed is “generational change, so they don’t link up.”
Dealing with the complexities of fragile states is “not just solving a headline problem,” he said. Unfortunately, “Europe defines priorities in terms of which countries are sending the most immigrants.”
Solving the problem isn't just the responsibility of the United Nations. “It’s a state problem and so states need to lead.”
Sarah Lister, Director of the UNDP Oslo Governance Centre agreed there can be no development “without peace and vice versa.” But one size doesn’t fit all.